Sermon as preached on 7/21/13 at Lambs and Evington UMC
When I was in school, especially when I was still in high school I remember dreading different formats for tests. Teachers found many different ways to test our knowledge about any particular subject. For me, the easiest questions were the True or False questions. You would be given a statement and had to determine whether or not it was true or whether it was false. They were the easiest to me because it was cut and dry, the statement was either true, or it was false. There were other forms of questions however that was not as simple, including the multiple choice questions. What I hated about multiple choice questions is the older you got the more sophisticated the questions would get, and eventually you would have a statement such as, “which of the following best answers the question?” It was that best that would always get me. It means that you good give a correct answers, you could even argue with the teacher after the fact that you were not wrong, and yet it was not the best answer for the question. For example a question could be, F Scott Fitzgerald is best known for which novel: A) Moby Dick, B) This Side of Paradise C) A Tale of Two Cities, D) The Great Gatsby. As you go through the question you can eliminate Moby Dick because that was written by Melville, and you can eliminate a Tale of Two cities because that was written by Dickens. But then you left with This Side of Paradise and the Great Gatsby which both seem to be correct answers, because both were written by Fitzgerald. A judgment call has to be made then to determine which he is best known for and therefore you would choose The Great Gatsby. The questions become much harder when there is a good answer, and yet there is a better one.
When I was in school, especially when I was still in high school I remember dreading different formats for tests. Teachers found many different ways to test our knowledge about any particular subject. For me, the easiest questions were the True or False questions. You would be given a statement and had to determine whether or not it was true or whether it was false. They were the easiest to me because it was cut and dry, the statement was either true, or it was false. There were other forms of questions however that was not as simple, including the multiple choice questions. What I hated about multiple choice questions is the older you got the more sophisticated the questions would get, and eventually you would have a statement such as, “which of the following best answers the question?” It was that best that would always get me. It means that you good give a correct answers, you could even argue with the teacher after the fact that you were not wrong, and yet it was not the best answer for the question. For example a question could be, F Scott Fitzgerald is best known for which novel: A) Moby Dick, B) This Side of Paradise C) A Tale of Two Cities, D) The Great Gatsby. As you go through the question you can eliminate Moby Dick because that was written by Melville, and you can eliminate a Tale of Two cities because that was written by Dickens. But then you left with This Side of Paradise and the Great Gatsby which both seem to be correct answers, because both were written by Fitzgerald. A judgment call has to be made then to determine which he is best known for and therefore you would choose The Great Gatsby. The questions become much harder when there is a good answer, and yet there is a better one.
Our scripture for today is a perfect example of the
difference between the good choice, and the best choice. Our scripture starts
with Jesus and his disciples being invited into the house of two sisters Martha
and Mary. When they entered the house Martha did all that she could to provide
hospitality to their guests. She slaved away in the kitchen preparing them
something to eat, cleaned up to make sure they would be comfortable there; In
essence Martha did everything she could to show respect to her honored guest.
While Martha was doing all of this however, her sister Mary simply sat at the
feet of Jesus and listened. Finally sick of the fact that her sister was not
helping her, Martha speaks to Jesus and tells him, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left
me to do all the work by myself? Tell her then to help me." Many of us may be surprised by Jesus’ answer as
he replies, “Martha, Martha, you are worried and
distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing. Mary has chosen the
better part, which will not be taken away from her."
When we hear this our first instinct is to question what
has Martha done wrong? After all many of us here are Marthas. We always try to
keep up with the best of our responsibilities, most of us are eager to be
hospitable to guests, and so why does Jesus seem to rebuke Martha? The thing is
Martha has done nothing wrong; she has done what is good and what is expected
of her. In fact if anybody had done anything wrong it seems to be Mary. Mary
neglects her responsibility to help her sister and simply sits at the feet of
Jesus. That action in itself is more of a wrong at that time than many of us
recognize when we read scripture through the lens of our modern world. In those times women were not seen as equals
to men, and there were certain gender roles and responsibilities that were
expected to be done by women. Especially in the presence of guests, women were
expected to be the servants to their male guests. Mary had rejected this
responsibility. Even worse than this, women were not supposed to sit at the feet
of a teacher; this was seen as a privilege for the men. In our scripture we
find Mary rejecting these social cues; neglecting her responsibility to serve as well as sitting in a place of honor
that society deemed her not to be worthy of.
In light of all of this we can see that Martha is in fact doing what is
good; she is doing what is expected of her, she is performing acts of
hospitality to her guests. Jesus never says what she is doing is wrong, instead
he says, “Mary has chosen the better part.” Mary
has chosen the better part.
So what then is the better
part? Why is what Mary does better than what Martha does? To answer that
question we must understand that this story in Luke does not sit in a vacuum by
itself. It is a continuation of a theme that Jesus had started earlier in the
chapter. Before arriving at the house of Martha and Mary, Jesus was asked by a
scribe what was necessary to get into heaven. Jesus asked what is written in
the scriptures, and the man replied, “Love the Lord
your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength
and with all your mind; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.” Not
satisfied with the answer the scribe asked Jesus and who is my neighbor. And so
Jesus told the parable of the Good Samaritan.
It is one of the best known parables in the Bible. In the story a man is beaten and robbed and
left for dead on the side of the road. A priest happens to walk by, but sees
the man and crosses on the opposite side of the road. Likewise, a Levite, ( who
were helpers of the priests) came saw
the man and crossed on the opposite side of the road. Finally a Samaritan, (
who were outcasts of society) saw the man beaten and took care of him, took him
to an inn and made all the provisions necessary that the man may be completely
taken care of. After he told this parable Jesus asked, which of these is the
neighbor, and the scribe responded, the one who showed mercy, and Jesus says “Go and do likewise.”
In the encounter with
scribe, Jesus makes clear what the Lord requires of us, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul
and with all your strength and with all your mind; and, ‘Love your neighbor as
yourself.” Through the
parable of the Good Samaritan Jesus teaches the scribes, teaches the disciples,
and Luke through his gospel teaches us the reader what it means to love your
neighbor as yourself. To leave the story there would be to only explain half of
the commandment that Jesus had given. We would only know what it means to love
our neighbor; we wouldn’t know what it means to love the Lord with all our
heart, with all of our soul, with all of our strength and with all of our mind.
For this reason, it is so important that we have the story of Martha and Mary
follow right after this parable.
It is as if through the
actions of Martha, God is showing us the danger of only following half of that
commandment. After all Martha is loving her neighbor as herself, maybe even
more than herself. She has invited them in, she has prepared a space for them
and is making the feel as welcome as possible. What is lacking for Martha
however, is an understanding the need to love God with all our hearts. Service is good, even great; but if it does
not start with a love for God than it is nothing more than a distraction.
It is easy for us to do
the same in our lives, to get distracted by the responsibilities in our lives,
even the noble ones, even our service.
How often do we get distracted by our work, even by our families so much
so that we push God to the wayside? Even in church we can get so devoted to
different groups and activities, responsibilities and meetings that we forget
that the reason we are doing all that we do is because God loves us, and
because we love God. All of these things are good, all of the things are
important, and yet when we lose sight of our love for God because of them we
like Martha become distracted. We must seek the better answer.
And so through the actions
of Mary, Jesus teaches Martha, his disciples, and all of us what it means to
love the Lord your God with all of your heart, soul, strength and mind. Mary
recognizes the presence of the Lord in her midst and puts everything aside to
be in his presence. Mary risks the consequences of breaking the social norms,
all so that she may hear what the Lord has to say. It is in fact quite amazing
paradox that by simply doing nothing but stopping and listening, that Mary is
doing so much and risking so much.
As we heard from Barbara
last week, the focus of this year’s annual conference was Lord teach us to
pray. I won’t harp on this too much because it is our scripture for next week,
but one thing that must be pointed out is that as I have talked to many people
after this annual conference, both clergy and lay, the consensus is that this
was one of the best and most powerful annual conferences that we have had in a
while, and everyone can identify why. It is because this annual conference
first and foremost focused on prayer; focused on being in the presence of God
and hearing the word of God. Not only did we open and close every session with
prayer, but with each decision that we made we went to the Lord in prayer about
it. We asked for God’s discernment for each topic. The Annual Conference truly
was focused on loving God and experiencing the love of God.
I must make a confession
though, going into the conference I was definitely a Martha. I knew the
reputation of Bishop Cho, I had even experienced his prayer centered leadership
style at Pastor’s Convocation in January, and I must admit that heading into
annual conference it made me a little nervous. I thought to myself, that’s
great and all, but what if we spend too much time in prayer? What if we don’t
get to everything on the agenda? The
days are condensed down from what they used to be several years ago, what if we
run out of time. And of course the worst of all, what if we don’t break on time
for lunches and dinners? Other than the
last question, these were legitimate questions, because the business aspect of
the conference is an extremely important issue since we only meet once a year.
And yet as we dove into prayer each day
found that we did in fact have time for business. And those who had been
to other annual conferences may have realized that the debates and arguments
were not as heated, not as long as other
conferences. That discussions were truly discussions, and that people disagreed
with each other, and felt comfortable enough to voice their disagreement, and
yet the animosity experienced in previous conferences did not seem to be
there. We loved the Lord with all of our
heart and soul, and the business still got done.
This is the lesson that
Martha and Mary teach us; that we must first seek after God. We must first love
the Lord our God with all of our hearts, souls, strength and minds. When we do this we find that there is still
time for our other responsibilities and our service, but not only is there
time, we find that this service and these responsibilities, and transformed by
our love for God. By taking the time to be with Christ, we are able to more
than if we had used that time for other responsibilities. We must not ignore these responsibilities, we
must continue to love our neighbor as ourselves, but we must first and foremost
do this through seeking the better answer; we must love our neighbors through
our love for God.
No comments:
Post a Comment